| A credit received by company A appointed port of loading as a port in B country and transshipment were prohibited. Based on the credit, the company A completed the products and shipped the first set of goods to D port and since the intended vessel is to arrive in F port, the rest was shipped to F port. Therefore, two sets of orignal B/L with a different port of loading and issuing date were NEGO and sent to a opening bank but the opening sent notification of payment refusal for partial shipment.
Case study
The definition of partial shipments
According to the fifth amended UCP 500, in case with the same vessel and the same route, shipped on different date and from different region is not regarded as a partial shipment. At this time, it applies the same even if the original B/L was issued in several sets.
Conclusion
In this case, the intended vessel are the same, goods were shipped from the same route which is D port and stopped by at F port for shipping than the approximate arrival time would be the same, therefore, according to the Sub-Article 40(b) of UCP, this is not regarded as a partial shipment.
|
Trade Helper 
Claim . Unpaid Cases 
40-Partial shipments / Drawings
2006 - 2011 tradegoods.com All right reserved